Jeffery Stein, ChFC, CLU ,LUTCF
President
Stein Financial Group

1600 Utica Ave S
9th floor
St Louis Park, MN 55416
612-895-5400
jstein@steinfg.com
www.Steinfinancialgroup.com

Understanding Guardianship for Older Adults

By Elaine Floyd, CFP ®

One day you may find yourself involved in guardianship proceedings for an elderly parent or relative. Here’s an overview of what guardianship means today, how the court evaluates the adult, and what you need to know.

Surprised senior couple reviewing paperwork

Guardianship promises to be a huge issue facing baby boomers in the years ahead, as they watch over elderly parents—often from a distance—and wonder if the time has come to take control of mom or dad’s affairs before something bad happens. In years past, the effort to obtain guardianship of an incapacitated adult was often an ugly, acrimonious process that stripped elderly people of virtually all of their rights. If a court determined that an older person was confused and couldn’t pay his or her bills or make independent decisions, a guardian was appointed to handle all of that person’s affairs and make decisions for him or her.

Guardianship of the person gives the guardian the right to make decisions concerning living arrangements and health care. Guardianship of the estate, also called conservatorship, gives the guardian, or conservator, the right to manage the person’s property. The all-or-nothing nature of guardianship has often led to fierce fights among family members and caregivers, to say nothing of the indignities suffered by elderly people who want to retain some semblance of autonomy.

So the American Bar Association, the Commission on Law and Aging, the American Psychological Association, and the National College of Probate Judges have collaborated to produce a handbook, Judicial Determination of Capacity of Older Adults, which lends nuance to the definition of capacity.

For one thing, capacity may be task-specific, not global. A person who can’t remember to pay his bills may still be able to make other key decisions. Also, capacity may fluctuate. A person in a coma or other temporary condition may need a guardian for a while and then be able to resume full functioning when she recovers. Capacity may also be situational and contextual. A home environment that is familiar and comfortable may enhance someone’s capacity, while a new and unfamiliar setting may undermine functional capacity.

In the handbook, they balance the benefits of guardianship with the rights and well-being of the person in question, crafting limited guardianship when appropriate, and identifying less restrictive alternatives to guardianship. If you are considering guardianship of an adult relative, you should educate yourself about these guidelines and think about the extent of the guardianship necessary.

6 areas of capacity

Courts that follow the guidelines will be gathering information in six areas.

  1. Medical condition. What is the cause of the person’s diminished capacity and is it likely to improve, stay the same, or get worse?
  2. Cognition. In what areas is the individual’s decision-making and thinking impaired, and to what extent? Can the person understand, communicate, and remember?
  3. Everyday functioning. What can the person do in the way of everyday activities? These include:
    • Care of self. Bathing, dressing, and meal preparation
    • Financial. Cash management, bill paying, and investment decisions
    • Medical. Healthcare decisions, medication management, and ability to get help in an emergency
    • Home and community life. Ability to maintain a clean and safe home, be left alone, drive or use public transportation, use the telephone, and avoid environmental dangers, such as the stove and poisons
    • Civil or legal. Retain legal counsel, vote, and make decisions about legal documents
  4. Values and preferences. Are the person’s choices consistent with long-held patterns, or has there been a sudden, unexplained shift? The guidelines note that eccentricity does not necessarily indicate diminished capacity.
  5. Risk of harm and level of supervision. What level of supervision is needed? How severe is the risk of harm to the individual?
  6. Means to enhance functioning. What treatments might improve the individual’s level of functioning? Consider whether education, training, rehabilitation, occupational therapy, or assistive devices might help.

Clinical assessments

Courts are encouraged to order assessments by various clinicians, including doctors, psychologists, and social workers, for the purpose of determining if guardianship is necessary. Page 25 of the handbook provides a form clinicians may use to evaluate a person’s need for guardianship. For each area of capacity, the clinician checks one of four boxes:

Financial advisors are not included among these clinicians, but if the elderly adult has a financial advisor, they can offer information arising from their longstanding relationship. They can also convey their concerns to you and other family members, or health care professionals who can incorporate them into their assessments. Because financial issues are so important and so vulnerable to slips in cognition, the handbook includes a number of questions that help determine whether or not a person can still manage his financial affairs.

The items to be evaluated in the financial area are:

After gathering information in all of the areas of capacity, the court fills out a guardianship order stating that the person is either incapacitated, not incapacitated, or partially incapacitated. If partially incapacitated, the court lists the retained capacities in the following five areas: care of self, financial decisions, health care decisions, living in the home and community, and other civil matters.

Again focusing on the financial area, it may be noted that a person is independent when it comes to handling small amounts of cash, but requires total care when buying or selling property. The guardianship plan would reflect these distinctions and give the guardian or conservator the appropriate powers.

Crafting the guardianship plan: Values and financial decisions

When it comes to crafting a guardianship plan, an elderly person’s relationship with her financial advisor does come into play. The new model gives the person—called a ward in legal terms—an opportunity to say that she would like to work with a particular advisor and to state certain preferences about how her money should be managed. The guardian can use the guidelines to accommodate the ward’s wishes when making decisions on his or her behalf.

Among the questions the ward might be asked about financial decisions are the following:

While there is no assurance that all courts will follow the guidelines, the handbook appears to be a good start in recognizing that elderly people should be entitled to retain some rights despite diminished capacity. By taking the time to explore the cause and nature of the incapacity, and by incorporating the person’s values and preferences into the guardianship plan, we can help ensure that people will not be stripped of their dignity due to illness or aging.

Resources


As director of retirement and life planning for Horsesmouth, Elaine Floyd helps advisors better serve their clients by understanding the practical and technical aspects of retirement income planning. A former wirehouse broker, she earned her CFP designation in 1986.